Document Actions
Government Inaction Threatens Great Bear Rainforest Agreement
Today, ForestEthics, Greenpeace, Rainforest Action Network and Sierra Club of Canada’s BC Chapter released their annual report card on the Great Bear Rainforest.
April 28, 2005 - For immediate Release:
Greenpeace Canada, Sierra Club of Canada, BC Chapter, ForestEthics, Rainforest Action Network.
Government Inaction Threatens Great Bear
Rainforest Agreement -
Annual Environmental Report Card Released
VANCOUVER – Today, ForestEthics, Greenpeace, Rainforest Action Network and Sierra Club of Canada’s BC Chapter released their annual report card on the Great Bear Rainforest. The groups awarded dismal grades to the B.C. government and logging companies for not finalizing and implementing the consensus solutions package for the region, forged by First Nations and multiple stakeholders.
The B.C. government and coastal logging companies received a ‘D’ for protection and an ‘F’ for ecological management and planning. The report card follows disappointing news earlier this month that the B.C. government would not approve the consensus agreement prior to calling the election.
“Most British Columbians think the Great Bear Rainforest is protected because both the NDP and Liberal governments said they would do precisely that,” stated Merran Smith of ForestEthics. “Inaction threatens the stability of the agreements and leaves us no choice but to communicate these dismal grades to the Canadian public and international marketplace.”
The land-use planning tables for the north and central coasts reached
consensus on protection, new logging practices, and socio-economic
recommendations. The consensus packages were submitted to the Province
and First Nations for final negotiation. All that the outcome required was a
B.C. Government decision.
In a separate agreement, several large logging companies active in the region agreed to voluntarily implement a set of new planning and practices measures, as a way of demonstrating their commitment to real change. More than a year later, there is little evidence of that change.
“For years, all parties set aside confrontation in favour of negotiation.
But a negotiated outcome cannot exist only on paper; it must be translated
into action,” said Catherine Stewart of Greenpeace. “Government’s
inaction coupled with the companies’ lack of change on the ground threatens
a fragile five-year peace.”
“The marketplace will be dismayed by this sort of inaction,” said Rainforest Action Network’s Mike Brune.
The solutions package attracted conservation investments of over $100
million in non-government funding for First Nations and other communities,
to be augmented by provincial and federal contributions. The lack
of a decision jeopardizes economic development in a region where
unemployment is as high as 80 percent.
“Government and independent studies have shown that economically and
ecologically this solutions package is a better option for the region than
business as usual,” stated Lisa Matthaus with Sierra Club of Canada,
BC Chapter. “The question is, which of the parties vying to form government
will make it a priority to act on the Great Bear Rainforest solutions
package?”
-30-
For more information, contact:
Merran Smith, ForestEthics 604-816-5636
Catherine Stewart, Greenpeace 604-761-6722
Lisa Matthaus, Sierra Club of Canada, BC Chapter 250-888-6267
More details at www.savethegreatbear.org